You’re cruising down Highway 24 on your Harley, enjoying one of those perfect Colorado mornings when suddenly a car pulls out right in front of you. The next thing you know, you’re sliding across the asphalt, your bike’s totaled, and you’re facing weeks of medical bills and recovery time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here’s where things get complicated: the other driver was clearly at fault for pulling out without looking, but the insurance adjuster is now claiming you were speeding and not wearing proper protective gear. They’re saying you’re partially to blame for your own injuries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Welcome to Colorado’s modified comparative negligence law \u2013 a legal rule that can really make or break your motorcycle accident case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Let me break this down in plain English. Modified comparative negligence is basically Colorado’s way of saying, “Hey, sometimes accidents happen because more than one person screwed up, and we need to figure out who’s responsible for what.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Think of it like this: imagine you and your buddy are making dinner together, and you both do something that leads to burning down the kitchen. Your buddy left the stove on (that’s 70% of the problem), but you also threw a dish towel too close to the burner (that’s 30% of the problem). Modified comparative negligence works the same way \u2013 it divides up the blame based on what each person did wrong.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In Colorado, this system has a specific twist that makes it “modified” rather than “pure” comparative negligence. If you’re found to be 50% or more at fault for the accident, you can’t recover any damages at all. But if you’re less than 50% at fault, you can still get compensation \u2013 just reduced by your percentage of fault.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So going back to our kitchen fire example: if the total damage was $10,000 and you were 30% at fault, you’d be responsible for $3,000 of the damage instead of the full amount.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Motorcycle cases are particularly tricky under this system because, let’s be honest, there’s still a lot of bias against motorcyclists. I’ve seen cases where riders who were clearly victims of someone else’s negligence suddenly find themselves fighting claims that they were “asking for trouble” just by being on a bike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here’s a scenario : A motorcyclist was hit by a driver who ran a red light. Pretty cut-and-dried case, right? Not so fast. The insurance company argued that the motorcyclist was wearing dark clothing at dusk and didn’t have reflective gear, making him partially responsible for not being visible enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Under Colorado’s modified comparative negligence rule, even if this argument held some water, the motorcyclist could still recover damages as long as his fault was determined to be less than 50%. If the jury decided he was 20% at fault for his visibility choices and 80% was on the red-light runner, he’d still get 80% of his damages covered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But here’s the kicker \u2013 if somehow the insurance company convinced a jury that the motorcyclist was 50% or more at fault (maybe by arguing he was also speeding or not paying attention), he’d walk away with nothing. Zero. Nada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This 50% threshold is absolutely critical in Colorado motorcycle cases. It’s not like some other states where you can be 90% at fault and still recover 10% of your damages. Colorado draws a hard line in the sand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I can’t stress this enough: the difference between being 49% at fault and 51% at fault is literally the difference between getting substantial compensation and getting nothing at all. This is why having experienced legal representation matters so much in motorcycle cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The insurance companies know this rule inside and out, and they’ll do everything they can to push your fault percentage over that 50% mark. They’ll scrutinize everything \u2013 your speed, your lane position, your gear, your experience level, even the route you chose to take that day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“The motorcyclist was speeding” is probably the most common defense I see in these cases. Even if you were going 5 mph over the speed limit, insurance adjusters will try to blow this up into a major contributing factor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here’s the thing though \u2013 just because you were speeding doesn’t automatically make you equally at fault. If someone runs a red light and hits you, their failure to yield right-of-way is typically going to be weighted much more heavily than your minor speed violation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The key is documenting everything. Police reports, witness statements, traffic camera footage, even your bike’s computer data if it’s available. Don’t let them paint a picture of reckless riding when the reality was much different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“We didn’t see the motorcycle” is another classic. Insurance companies love to flip this around and suggest that if you weren’t seen, you must not have been riding defensively enough or making yourself visible enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This one really gets under my skin because it puts the burden on motorcyclists to compensate for other drivers’ failure to look properly. Yes, wearing bright colors and reflective gear is smart. But a driver’s failure to check their blind spot or look twice at intersections isn’t your fault just because you weren’t lit up like a Christmas tree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
New riders often face additional scrutiny. Insurance adjusters will dig into your riding history and try to argue that inexperience contributed to the accident. While there might be some validity to this in certain situations, it’s often overblown.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The key question isn’t whether you’re an experienced rider \u2013 it’s whether your actions in that specific situation were reasonable under the circumstances.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
These are more technical aspects that insurance companies love to nitpick. They’ll bring in accident reconstruction experts to argue that you were riding in the wrong part of the lane or following too closely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Si bien la correcta colocaci\u00f3n en el carril y la distancia de seguridad son pr\u00e1cticas de seguridad importantes, estos factores deben evaluarse en contexto. \u00bfCu\u00e1l era la situaci\u00f3n del tr\u00e1fico? \u00bfEn qu\u00e9 condiciones estaba la carretera? \u00bfExist\u00eda una raz\u00f3n leg\u00edtima para su colocaci\u00f3n?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You might be wondering who actually decides these fault percentages. It’s not just some arbitrary number an insurance adjuster pulls out of thin air (though sometimes it feels that way).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
First, the insurance companies will do their own investigation and assign fault percentages. This is where having your own documentation becomes critical. Don’t just accept their version of events \u2013 they’re not exactly neutral parties in this process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Los ajustadores de seguros est\u00e1n capacitados para minimizar los pagos y, en estados de negligencia comparativa como Colorado, trasladarle a usted incluso un peque\u00f1o porcentaje de culpa puede ahorrarles miles de d\u00f3lares.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Police reports carry significant weight in these determinations, but they’re not the final word. I’ve seen cases where the responding officer didn’t have all the facts or made assumptions that weren’t accurate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If you disagree with the police report, you can usually request to have it amended if you have evidence that contradicts the officer’s findings. This needs to be done quickly though \u2013 most departments have time limits on when amendments can be made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If your case goes to trial, the jury will ultimately decide fault percentages. This is where having skilled legal representation really matters. Your attorney needs to present a compelling narrative that minimizes your fault while highlighting the other party’s negligence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Juries can be unpredictable, especially in motorcycle cases where bias might come into play. Some jurors might have preconceived notions about motorcyclists being risk-takers or “asking for trouble.” A good attorney knows how to address these biases head-on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Perm\u00edtanme compartir algunos escenarios para ilustrar c\u00f3mo funciona todo esto en la pr\u00e1ctica:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A motorcyclist was traveling straight through an intersection when a car made a left turn directly into his path. The car driver claimed he didn’t see the motorcycle and that the sun was in his eyes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Initially, this seemed like a clear-cut case of the car driver’s fault. But the insurance company argued that the motorcyclist was traveling 10 mph over the speed limit and could have avoided the collision if he’d been going slower.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tras la investigaci\u00f3n y la negociaci\u00f3n, se impuso una indemnizaci\u00f3n de 851 TP3T al conductor del autom\u00f3vil y de 151 TP3T al motociclista. Dado que el motociclista no cumpl\u00eda con el umbral de 501 TP3T, recuper\u00f3 851 TP3T de sus da\u00f1os, que ascendieron a aproximadamente 180 000 TP4T en gastos m\u00e9dicos y salarios perdidos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Una motocicleta fue chocada por detr\u00e1s mientras estaba detenida en un sem\u00e1foro. Parece bastante obvio, \u00bfverdad? La compa\u00f1\u00eda de seguros intent\u00f3 argumentar que el motociclista ten\u00eda parte de la culpa porque estaba detenido en el centro del carril en lugar de posicionarse para tener una ruta de escape.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This case highlights how insurance companies will grasp at straws to assign fault to motorcyclists. Fortunately, Colorado law doesn’t require motorcyclists to position themselves defensively at all times \u2013 you have the right to use the full lane just like any other vehicle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
El caso se resolvi\u00f3 con la culpa 100% asignada al conductor que choc\u00f3 por detr\u00e1s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This one was more complicated. A motorcyclist was making a right turn at an intersection when a car running a red light struck him. However, the motorcyclist had made a “rolling stop” at the stop sign instead of coming to a complete stop.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
La compa\u00f1\u00eda de seguros argument\u00f3 que si el motociclista hubiera hecho una parada adecuada, habr\u00eda visto venir al infractor y podr\u00eda haber evitado la colisi\u00f3n.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Este caso termin\u00f3 en juicio, y el jurado atribuy\u00f3 la culpa 30% al motociclista y 70% al conductor del autom\u00f3vil. El motociclista recuper\u00f3 70% de sus da\u00f1os.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
La mejor defensa contra demandas por negligencia comparativa comienza incluso antes de subirse a la bicicleta. Aqu\u00ed tienes algunos pasos pr\u00e1cticos:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Prep\u00e1rese adecuadamente<\/strong>: I know it’s tempting to just throw on a helmet and go, especially on hot days. But proper protective gear isn’t just about safety \u2013 it’s also about protecting yourself legally. If you’re in an accident while wearing shorts and flip-flops, you can bet the insurance company will use that against you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Conozca las reglas<\/strong>: Make sure you’re up to date on Colorado’s motorcycle laws. This includes things like lane-splitting rules (which Colorado recently legalized under specific conditions), helmet requirements, and licensing requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mantenimiento de su bicicleta<\/strong>Mant\u00e9ngase al d\u00eda con el mantenimiento regular y docum\u00e9ntelo. Si una falla mec\u00e1nica contribuye a un accidente, querr\u00e1 poder demostrar que cuid\u00f3 adecuadamente su bicicleta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Lo que haga inmediatamente despu\u00e9s de un accidente puede tener enormes implicaciones para su caso:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Documentar todo<\/strong>: Take photos of everything \u2013 the vehicles, the road conditions, traffic signs, skid marks, your injuries, your gear. Don’t rely on the police to capture every detail.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Obtener informaci\u00f3n de testigos<\/strong>Los testigos independientes pueden ser de gran ayuda para combatir demandas por negligencia comparativa. Obtenga su informaci\u00f3n de contacto y p\u00eddales que describan lo que vieron.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ten cuidado con lo que dices<\/strong>: Don’t admit fault or speculate about what happened. Stick to the facts of what you observed. Saying something like “I’m sorry” might seem polite, but it can be twisted into an admission of guilt later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Busque atenci\u00f3n m\u00e9dica<\/strong>Aunque te sientas bien, hazte una revisi\u00f3n. La adrenalina puede enmascarar lesiones, y tener documentaci\u00f3n m\u00e9dica inmediata te ayudar\u00e1 en tu caso.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Here’s where things get tricky. You’re required to cooperate with your own insurance company, but you need to be very careful about what you say to the other party’s insurer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n No d\u00e9 declaraciones grabadas<\/strong>: The other party’s insurance company will often call within hours of the accident asking for a recorded statement. You’re not required to give one, and I strongly recommend against it. These statements are often used to lock you into a version of events before you’ve had time to fully process what happened.<\/p>\n\n\n\n No acepte ofertas de liquidaci\u00f3n r\u00e1pida<\/strong>: Insurance companies sometimes make lowball settlement offers very quickly, hoping you’ll accept before you understand the full extent of your injuries or damages. Don’t be pressured into accepting anything without having it reviewed by an attorney.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Para obtener orientaci\u00f3n m\u00e1s detallada sobre c\u00f3mo tratar con compa\u00f1\u00edas de seguros, puede consultar nuestras preguntas frecuentes sobre si debe dar una declaraci\u00f3n grabada a una compa\u00f1\u00eda de seguros.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Let’s talk numbers for a minute, because understanding the financial implications can help you see why fighting these fault determinations is so important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Say you’re in an accident that results in $100,000 in total damages (medical bills, lost wages, bike replacement, pain and suffering, etc.). Here’s how different fault percentages would affect your recovery:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00bfVes lo dram\u00e1tico que es ese precipicio en 50%? Por eso las aseguradoras se esfuerzan tanto para que los motociclistas superen ese umbral.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Las motocicletas presentan desaf\u00edos \u00fanicos bajo la ley de negligencia comparativa que debe conocer:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some insurance adjusters will actually try to use a motorcycle’s inherent vulnerability against riders. They’ll argue that by choosing to ride a motorcycle instead of driving a car, you “assumed the risk” of more serious injuries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This argument is generally not accepted by Colorado courts, but it’s something you might encounter. You have the same right to use public roads on a motorcycle as anyone else has in a car.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Colorado’s weather can change quickly, and road conditions that might be manageable in a car can be treacherous on a motorcycle. If you’re in an accident during adverse conditions, expect the insurance company to scrutinize your decision to ride that day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n While riding in bad weather isn’t automatically negligent, you do need to adjust your riding to match conditions. If you were riding the same way in a snowstorm as you would on a clear day, that might contribute to fault determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you’re riding in a group when an accident occurs, the dynamics can get complicated. Insurance companies might try to argue that group riding inherently increases risk or that peer pressure led to more aggressive riding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Document the group’s riding practices and make sure witnesses can speak to whether the group was riding responsibly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Look, I get it \u2013 nobody wants to deal with lawyers if they don’t have to. Legal fees, complicated procedures, months or years of back-and-forth \u2013 it’s not exactly fun. But in motorcycle accident cases involving comparative negligence, trying to handle things yourself can be a costly mistake.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Aqu\u00ed hay algunas se\u00f1ales de que definitivamente necesitas ayuda legal profesional:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Insurance Company Is Claiming You’re 50% or More at Fault<\/strong>: This is a red flag situation. If they’re trying to push you over that 50% threshold, you need someone who knows how to fight these determinations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sus lesiones son graves<\/strong>:Cuanto m\u00e1s graves sean sus lesiones, m\u00e1s dinero estar\u00e1 en juego y m\u00e1s luchar\u00e1n las compa\u00f1\u00edas de seguros para minimizar su pago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hay disputas sobre lo que sucedi\u00f3<\/strong>Si hay relatos contradictorios del accidente, necesita a alguien que sepa c\u00f3mo reunir y presentar pruebas de manera eficaz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Other Party Doesn’t Have Insurance or Enough Insurance<\/strong>:Esto complica las cosas significativamente y a menudo implica tratar con su propia compa\u00f1\u00eda de seguros bajo su cobertura de automovilista sin seguro o con seguro insuficiente.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At McCormick & Murphy P.C., we’ve been handling these types of cases since 1995. We understand how Colorado’s comparative negligence law works and how to fight back against unfair fault determinations. Located at 929 W Colorado Ave in Colorado Springs, we’ve seen just about every variation of motorcycle accident case you can imagine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n What I appreciate about working with experienced attorneys is that they handle cases on a contingent fee basis \u2013 meaning you don’t pay attorney fees unless they recover money for you. When you’re dealing with medical bills and lost wages from an accident, this arrangement removes the financial stress of pursuing your case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n En casos complejos de accidentes de motocicleta, los peritos pueden ser decisivos para el caso. Estos pueden incluir:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Expertos en reconstrucci\u00f3n de accidentes<\/strong>Estas personas pueden analizar la evidencia f\u00edsica y crear recreaciones detalladas de c\u00f3mo ocurri\u00f3 el accidente. A menudo, pueden desmentir las afirmaciones de las aseguradoras sobre la velocidad, la distancia de frenado o los \u00e1ngulos de impacto.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Expertos en seguridad de motocicletas<\/strong>: These experts can testify about proper riding techniques, whether your actions were reasonable under the circumstances, and whether the other party’s claims about motorcycle operation make sense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Expertos m\u00e9dicos<\/strong>: Particularly important for explaining how your injuries occurred and whether they’re consistent with the accident as described.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Expertos econ\u00f3micos<\/strong>:Para calcular la capacidad de ingresos perdida y los da\u00f1os futuros, especialmente importante en casos que involucran lesiones permanentes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n La clave es saber cu\u00e1ndo necesita a estos expertos y c\u00f3mo utilizar su testimonio eficazmente. Esta es otra \u00e1rea donde una representaci\u00f3n legal experimentada marca una gran diferencia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When we talk about damages in motorcycle accident cases, we’re not just talking about your medical bills and bike repairs. Colorado law allows recovery for a wide range of damages, including:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Estos son los costos de bolsillo y las p\u00e9rdidas financieras:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Estos son m\u00e1s dif\u00edciles de cuantificar, pero igualmente reales:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The tricky thing about comparative negligence is that it reduces ALL of these damages by your fault percentage. So if you had $50,000 in medical bills and $100,000 in pain and suffering damages, and you’re found 20% at fault, you’d lose 20% of both categories.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Colorado’s motorcycle laws have evolved in recent years, and these changes can impact comparative negligence determinations:<\/p>\n\n\n\n As of 2022, Colorado allows lane filtering under specific conditions. This means motorcycles can move between stopped or slow-moving traffic in certain situations. However, if you’re in an accident while lane filtering, expect the insurance company to scrutinize whether you were following the specific requirements of the law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Colorado doesn’t require adult motorcyclists to wear helmets, but if you’re in an accident without one, the insurance company will likely argue it contributed to your injuries. While not wearing a helmet can’t increase your fault for causing the accident, it might affect damages if it made your injuries worse than they would have been otherwise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If your case goes to trial, understanding how juries think about motorcycle accidents can be important. Unfortunately, there’s still some bias against motorcyclists in our society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Algunos jurados podr\u00edan pensar:<\/p>\n\n\n\n A skilled attorney knows how to address these biases during jury selection and throughout the trial. They’ll work to educate jurors about motorcycling and help them see you as a responsible person who happened to be riding a motorcycle, not as a stereotype.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Here’s something that surprises a lot of people: your own insurance company doesn’t always have your back. If you’re making a claim under your own uninsured\/underinsured motorist coverage, your insurance company essentially steps into the shoes of the at-fault party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This means they might use the same comparative negligence arguments against you that the other party’s insurance would use. It’s a weird situation where the company you’ve been paying premiums to for years suddenly becomes adversarial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you find yourself in this situation, you might want to read more about how to file a complaint against an insurance company in Colorado or learn about challenging an insurance company’s decision in bad faith cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Colorado tiene plazos espec\u00edficos (llamados estatutos de limitaciones) para presentar demandas por lesiones personales. En la mayor\u00eda de los casos de accidentes de motocicleta, tiene tres a\u00f1os a partir de la fecha del accidente para presentar una demanda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But don’t wait until the last minute. Evidence disappears, witnesses’ memories fade, and your case gets harder to prove as time goes on. The sooner you start building your case, the better position you’ll be in to fight comparative negligence claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Lidiar con un accidente de motocicleta ya es bastante dif\u00edcil sin tener que luchar contra determinaciones de culpa injustas. Las lesiones f\u00edsicas, el trauma emocional y el estr\u00e9s financiero pueden ser abrumadores.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But here’s what I want you to remember: just because someone claims you’re partially at fault doesn’t make it true. Insurance companies have a financial incentive to minimize their payouts, and they’ll use every tool at their disposal to do so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You have rights under Colorado law, and you don’t have to accept an unfair fault determination. With proper legal representation and a thorough investigation of your case, you can fight back against these claims and get the compensation you deserve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The key is acting quickly and getting the right help. Don’t let insurance adjusters pressure you into accepting fault or settling for less than your case is worth. Take the time to understand your rights and explore your options.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Remember, comparative negligence isn’t about finding someone to blame \u2013 it’s about fairly allocating responsibility based on what actually happened. When insurance companies try to unfairly shift blame onto motorcyclists, they’re not just hurting individual riders \u2013 they’re undermining the entire system of accountability that keeps our roads safer for everyone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you’ve been in a motorcycle accident in Colorado and you’re facing comparative negligence claims, don’t go it alone. The stakes are too high, and the system is too complex to handle without experienced help. Reach out to someone who understands both the legal and practical aspects of these cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At McCormick & Murphy P.C., we’ve spent decades helping Colorado motorcyclists fight unfair fault determinations and get the compensation they deserve. We understand the unique challenges motorcyclists face, and we’re not intimidated by insurance companies who try to shift blame unfairly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Your case matters, your rights matter, and you deserve to have someone in your corner who will fight for you. Don’t let comparative negligence become a weapon used against you \u2013 make it work the way it’s supposed to work, fairly and based on the actual facts of your case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The road to recovery after a motorcycle accident is never easy, but understanding your rights under Colorado’s modified comparative negligence law is an important first step. Stay informed, stay protected, and don’t be afraid to stand up for yourself when insurance companies try to treat you unfairly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After all, you’ve got enough to worry about without having to fight an uphill battle against unfair fault determinations. Focus on your recovery and let experienced professionals handle the legal complexities. That’s what we’re here for.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Vas por la autopista 24 en tu Harley, disfrutando de una de esas ma\u00f1anas perfectas de Colorado, cuando de repente un coche se cruza justo delante de ti. De repente, te deslizas por el asfalto, tu moto est\u00e1 destrozada y te enfrentas a semanas de facturas m\u00e9dicas y tiempo de recuperaci\u00f3n. Aqu\u00ed es donde la cosa se complica:... <\/p>\nEn la escena de un accidente<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Trabajar con compa\u00f1\u00edas de seguros<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
El impacto financiero de los porcentajes de culpa<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Consideraciones especiales para casos de motocicletas<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
El factor vulnerabilidad<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Condiciones meteorol\u00f3gicas y de la carretera<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Din\u00e1mica de conducci\u00f3n en grupo<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Cuando necesitas ayuda profesional<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
El papel de los testigos expertos<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Comprensi\u00f3n de los da\u00f1os en casos de negligencia comparativa<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Da\u00f1os econ\u00f3micos<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
Da\u00f1os no econ\u00f3micos<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
Cambios recientes en la ley de Colorado<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Filtrado de carriles<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Leyes sobre el uso del casco<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
La psicolog\u00eda de las decisiones del jurado<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
C\u00f3mo tratar con su propia compa\u00f1\u00eda de seguros<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
La importancia del tiempo<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Avanzando despu\u00e9s de un accidente<\/h2>\n\n\n\n